Think Railways

Railway Business Intelligence

ECIPE brief: The Japan-EU Negotiations on Railway

August 14
15:07 2014

Despite major advancements in the Japan-EU FTA (JEUFTA) negotiations, the talks remain difficult in the railway sector. These difficulties flow largely from the fact that the Japanese railways are organized on a radically different legal and economic basis than the railway systems in the EU. First, the three major Japanese passenger rail companies, are totally privatized, listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange and do not receive pub- lic subsidies. Japanese firms are even “more private” than an US railway company such as Amtrak, funded by federal money. In the Japanese deregulation, the markets remained unbundled with passenger rail companies owning both trains and tracks.

As a result, the government involvement on these firms are less than in Europe, where passenger rail firms did not have the freedom to choose the providers of their equipments. Meanwhile in Japan, the competition between private companies with no access to public funds made it necessary for these companies to be demanding with respect to the railway equipment companies.

This paper argues that, if these differences have made so far the negotiations more difficult, they also offer more opportunities in the future for the Japanese and EU railway companies in a global world. A huge mature market such as the Japanese requires by definition a massive amount of money in terms of maintenance, renewal and modernization of the infrastructure (signaling equipment) and of the rolling stock. Every year, about 40-50% of the JR capital expenditure is spent for safety and renewal in rolling stock and signaling equipment.

However, the EU rail equipment industry argued that the Japanese companies should be covered by the principles of government procurement, such as those in the GATT/WTO Government Procurement Agreement (both Japan and the EU are Members) or even shall follow the EU public procurement rules. Requiring Japan to subject its private passenger rail companies to government procurement would be tantamount to require that, for instance, the EUMS recently privatized telecom firms a decade or two ago should be subjected to government procurement procedures in the JEUFTA—with the risk of making a precedent for the EU-US TTIP.

Such a proposal would rightly come as a shocking proposal to everybody in the EU. That said, if it does not make sense to deal with private Japanese passenger rail companies in a railway section of the JEUFTA government procurement provisions, it does make sense to deal with all the railway issues in one chapter specifically to railway—opening the door to industrial cooperation in a world context.

See paper 

 

Share

Related Articles

0 Comments

No Comments Yet!

There are no comments at the moment, do you want to add one?

Write a comment

Write a Comment

Access to Railway Data



Register Subscribe for free

Business. Data. Insights

Join Think Railways

Get the railway data

Railway safety statistics

Safety in EU rail transport has steadily enhanced over the years: in 2013, the decline in number of accidents compared with 2012 could be established at 1.9 % on 26 Jan 2015
Read Full story »

TCDD key statistics 2011- 2013 Data Vizualisation

Turkish State Railways (TCDD) posted a loss of TL 1.28 billion (EUR 461 million) in 2013, the largest loss of all the State Economic Enterprises (KIT). on 26 Jan 2015
Read Full story »

Overview - Polish rolling stock manufacturers

For several years, Polish manufacturers of rolling stock have been paying close attention to the terms of tenders for supply of new trains and trams abroad. on 26 Jan 2015
Read Full story »
European Railway Research and Innovation Conference
Loading

Free Delivery on all Books at the Book Depository